Joan Dean1
F, #12241, b. 1620
| Father* | John Dean1 b. 1589, d. b 1666 | |
| Mother* | Elizabeth (?)1 b. c 1595, d. a 29 Dec 1666 | |
Joan Dean|b. 1620|p409.htm#i12241|John Dean|b. 1589\nd. b 1666|p408.htm#i12234|Elizabeth (?)|b. c 1595\nd. a 29 Dec 1666|p409.htm#i12244|John Dean|b. 1558|p408.htm#i12227|||||||||| | ||
| Christening* | 1620 | Kingsbury Episcopi, Somerset, England1 |
| Marriage* | before 1635 | Principal=William Stuckey1 |
| Married Name | Stuckey1 | |
| Note* | Sources of Information: 1. Dr. Campbell's Index1 |
| Last Edited | 14 Oct 2003 |
Citations
- [S238] Wilma Stone, 2003.
John Dean1
M, #12242, b. 9 February 1622
| Father* | John Dean1 b. 1589, d. b 1666 | |
| Mother* | Elizabeth (?)1 b. c 1595, d. a 29 Dec 1666 | |
John Dean|b. 9 Feb 1622|p409.htm#i12242|John Dean|b. 1589\nd. b 1666|p408.htm#i12234|Elizabeth (?)|b. c 1595\nd. a 29 Dec 1666|p409.htm#i12244|John Dean|b. 1558|p408.htm#i12227|||||||||| | ||
| Christening* | 9 February 1622 | Kingsbury Episcopi, Somerset, England1 |
| Note* | Sources of Information: 1. Dr. Campbell's Index1 |
| Last Edited | 14 Oct 2003 |
Citations
- [S238] Wilma Stone, 2003.
Edith or Editha Dean1
F, #12243, b. 27 January 1627/28
| Father* | John Dean1 b. 1589, d. b 1666 | |
| Mother* | Elizabeth (?)1 b. c 1595, d. a 29 Dec 1666 | |
Edith or Editha Dean|b. 27 Jan 1627/28|p409.htm#i12243|John Dean|b. 1589\nd. b 1666|p408.htm#i12234|Elizabeth (?)|b. c 1595\nd. a 29 Dec 1666|p409.htm#i12244|John Dean|b. 1558|p408.htm#i12227|||||||||| | ||
| Christening* | 27 January 1627/28 | Kingsbury Episcopi, Somerset, England1 |
| Note* | Sources of Information: 1. Dr. Campbell's Index1 |
| Last Edited | 14 Oct 2003 |
Citations
- [S238] Wilma Stone, 2003.
Elizabeth (?)1
F, #12244, b. circa 1595, d. after 29 December 1666
| Birth* | circa 1595 | 1 |
| Marriage* | Principal=John Dean1 | |
| Death* | after 29 December 1666 | South Petherton & Kingsbury Episcopi, Somerset, England1 |
| Married Name | Dean1 | |
| Will* | 29 December 1666 | Will of Elizabeth Dean dated 29 December 1666 Notes: 'May have had daughter Edith and son-in-law William Stuckey' according to Elizabeth' s will.1 |
Family | John Dean b. 1589, d. b 1666 | |
| Children |
| |
| Last Edited | 24 Oct 2003 |
Citations
- [S238] Wilma Stone, 2003.
Elizabeth Dean1
F, #12245, b. 1631
| Father* | John Dean1 b. 1589, d. b 1666 | |
| Mother* | Elizabeth (?)1 b. c 1595, d. a 29 Dec 1666 | |
Elizabeth Dean|b. 1631|p409.htm#i12245|John Dean|b. 1589\nd. b 1666|p408.htm#i12234|Elizabeth (?)|b. c 1595\nd. a 29 Dec 1666|p409.htm#i12244|John Dean|b. 1558|p408.htm#i12227|||||||||| | ||
| Christening* | 1631 | Kingsbury Episcopi, Somerset, England1 |
| Marriage* | 1 November 1658 | Kingsbury Episcopi, Somerset, England, Principal=William Rodburd1 |
| Married Name | Rodburd1 | |
| Note* | Sources of Information: 1. Dr. Campbell's Index1 |
| Last Edited | 14 Oct 2003 |
Citations
- [S238] Wilma Stone, 2003.
Mary Dean1
F, #12246, b. 27 December 1634
| Father* | John Dean1 b. 1589, d. b 1666 | |
| Mother* | Elizabeth (?)1 b. c 1595, d. a 29 Dec 1666 | |
Mary Dean|b. 27 Dec 1634|p409.htm#i12246|John Dean|b. 1589\nd. b 1666|p408.htm#i12234|Elizabeth (?)|b. c 1595\nd. a 29 Dec 1666|p409.htm#i12244|John Dean|b. 1558|p408.htm#i12227|||||||||| | ||
| Christening* | 27 December 1634 | Kingsbury Episcopi, Somerset, England1 |
| Note* | Sources of Information: 1. Dr. Campbell's Index1 |
| Last Edited | 14 Oct 2003 |
Citations
- [S238] Wilma Stone, 2003.
Thomas Stower1
M, #12247
| Marriage* | 23 October 1560 | Kingsbury Episcopi, Somerset, England, Principal=Ann Deane1 |
| Last Edited | 14 Oct 2003 |
Citations
- [S238] Wilma Stone, 2003.
Ann Deane1
F, #12248
| Father* | (?) Deane1 | |
Ann Deane||p409.htm#i12248|(?) Deane||p409.htm#i12249|||||||||||||||| | ||
| Marriage* | 23 October 1560 | Kingsbury Episcopi, Somerset, England, Principal=Thomas Stower1 |
| Married Name | Stower1 |
| Last Edited | 14 Oct 2003 |
Citations
- [S238] Wilma Stone, 2003.
Alce Salsbury1
F, #12250
| Marriage* | 26 July 1591 | Kingsbury Episcopi, Somerset, England, Principal=George Dean1 |
| Married Name | Dean1 |
Family | George Dean b. 1563 | |
| Children |
| |
| Last Edited | 14 Oct 2003 |
Citations
- [S238] Wilma Stone, 2003.
John Prigge1
M, #12251
| Marriage* | 24 April 1587 | Kingsbury Episcopi, Somerset, England, Principal=Ann Dean1 |
| Last Edited | 14 Oct 2003 |
Citations
- [S238] Wilma Stone, 2003.
John Longbridge1
M, #12252
| Marriage* | 29 September 1580 | Kingsbury Episcopi, Somerset, England, Principal=Joan Dean1 |
| Last Edited | 14 Oct 2003 |
Citations
- [S238] Wilma Stone, 2003.
Lancelot Davenport1
M, #12253, b. 1596
| Birth* | 1596 | England1 |
| Name Variation | Lanslott Damport2 | |
| Name Variation | Lawly Damport3 | |
| Occupation* | between 1620 and 1627 | Jamestown, VA, servant to Mr. Edward Blaney3 |
| Emigration* | January 1620 | London, Middlesex, England, aboard the ship Duty. The Ship Duty was dispatched from London to Virginia under charter to the Virginia Company with 51 persons [including Lancelot Davenport] aboard. Coldham, I:22) Davenport's presence on the Ship was reported in the Muster of Inhabitants taken in early 1625 (see below). The Duty also made the trip to Virginia in both 1618 and 1619 also, but apparently was not under contract to the Company for those [voyages. 4 |
| Event-Misc* | 16 February 1623/24 | Jamestown, VA, SURVIVORS: Among those named on lists compiled following the Good Friday Massacre by Indians of the Powhatan Confederation on 22Mar1621/22 were: "A LIST OF THE LIVING" At Jamestown and within the Corporation thereof Edward Blaney [Factor for Virginia Company of London and master of Lancelot Davenport] Lancelot Davenport (as Lanslott Dansport) [The first appearance of the surname DAVENPORT in North America records.] Mrs. Southey, and her daughter Ann [Widow and daughter of Henry Southey, Virginia Company shareholder, who, with his family and servants (among whom was John Davenport), had arrived from England only a week or so before the Massacre]. Thomas Gray, his wife [unnamed], daughter Joan, and son William [In 1639 an adjoining freeholder to Lancelot Davenport at head of Gray's Creek, South side of the James River.] At the Plantation over against Jamestown Lancelot Davenport (as Lanslott Damport) 2 |
| Event-Misc | between 20 January 1625 and 7 February 1625 | Jamestown, VA, MUSTER OF INHABITANTS: As ordered by the Commissioners for Virginia in London appointed by the King, each Virginia Master held a Household Muster and provided a detailed list of members of his/her respective household, together with ages of individuals and identification of what ship had brought each to Virginia. The only Muster including a Davenport was that of Mr. Edward Blaney, a Factor, who arrived in Virginia in 1621, and who married the widow of Captain William Powell. THE MUSTER OF MR. EDWARD BLANEY AT JAMESTOWN Mr. Edward Blaney came in the Francis Bonaventure [1621]* SERVANTS Robert Bew, age 20, came in the Duty.** John Russell, age 19, came in the Bona Nova.* [The rest of his servants were at his plantation over the water.] AT MR. BLANEY'S PLANTATION, OVER THE WATERS [South side of James River, across from Jamestown] SERVANTS Rice Watkins, age 30, came in the Francis Bonaventure. Nathaniel Floid, age 24, came in the Bona Nova**. George Rogers, age 23, came in the Bona Nova.* John Shelley, age 23, came in the Bona Nova.** Thomas Ottowell, age 40, came in the Bona Nova.** Thomas Crouch, age 40, came in the Bona Nova.** Robert Shepherd, age 20, came in the Hopewell.* William Sawyer, age 18, came in the Hopewell. ** Robert Chauntrie, age 19, came in the George.** William Hartley, age 23, came in the Charles.** Lancelot Davenport (as Lawly Damport), age 29, came in the Duty [1620].** William Ward, age 20, came in the Jonathan.** Jeremy White, age 20, came in the Tyger.* John Hacker, age 17, came in Hopewell Robert Whitmore, age 22, came in the Duty.* 3 |
| Event-Misc | 20 July 1639 | James City, VA, LAND PATENT: Lancelot Davenport (as Dampert), 50 acres in James City County, [on the south side of James River on Gray's Creek]. West upon land now planted upon by Thomas Gray. For his PERSONAL ADVENTURE. (Virginia Patents, 1-II:669) Commentary by J. S. Davenport: FIFTEEN YEARS HAD PASSED since Lancelot was enumerated in the Muster of 1625 as being 29-years-old, having arrived in Virginia in 1620 on the Ship Duty, and being a servant in the household of Edward Blaney, factor (business manager, storekeeper, shipper, agent) for the Virginia Company, and located at Blaney's plantation on the south side of the James. Assuming the Lancelot of 1625 was the same Lancelot who was granted the land here, he was now 44-years-old, well into middle age by the average life span of those times, and he had moved up substantially in social class. If he had a family, it was either started by now or soon afterwards. PERSONAL ADVENTURE was the term used for persons who, before Virginia had become a Crown Colony in 1625, had come to America of their own volitions and had paid their own way from England. They were not obligated for their passage to another. Servants did not have PERSONAL ADVENTURES because they were in Virginia for the convenience of their masters who had paid for their passages. ["Apprentices were given fifty acres upon emerging from their apprenticeships, but no servant was entitled to land upon completing their service" (Andrews, Charles M., The Colonial Period in American History, I (1934):209fn.)]. Many English were shipped to Virginia as unemployed, vagrants, welfare depend-ents, and criminals of all degrees. On arrival, the captains sold their human cargo to masters and planters either by auction or contract, and qualified for a 50-acre headright from the Colonial Government for each persons transported. Trans-portees generally were required to serve four years of indentured servitude to discharge the passage debt. In the early years of the Colony, few completed the process, for, according to Governor Berkekley in 1671, four out of five died in the early years of Virginia. Few of the those transportees survived to earn their freedom. Headrights (free land bounty) of 50 acres each, awarded for coming to Virginia, belonged to whoever paid for or bore the expense of the passage from England. In Lancelot's case, given his enumeration of 1625, it was either Edward Blaney or a third party who had sold Lancelot's indenture to Blaney. Presuming that Lancelot did not pay his own way to become a servant in Virginia, the only way he could have obtained the headright earned by his arrival in 1620 was to have bought it from whoever owned the right. But that involved an awkward situation, for the owner most likely was the Virginia Company of London, and that corporation went defunct in 1628. This grant was made eleven years later. Social class stratification, equally rigid to that of England, existed in Virginia from its founding in 1607 until the American Revolution. While a servant could become a master, it rarely happened, for it took years and required strong motivation and hard work to move from an indentured servant to freeman servant, then to a yeoman (a freeman on his own), and then, a high degree of respected craft, business, or service skill having been acquired over a period of years, to a freeholder or householder who had others, apprentices, craftsmen, servants and/or slaves, working for him and living under his roof and care. English Custom and Society then dictated that sons should follow in their father's footsteps. If the father was a merchant, sons were expected to be merchants. If the father was a blacksmith, so was the son, generation after generation. When there were too many sons to put to the craft or trade, or land, younger sons often fell by the wayside, regressed back into the servant or poor, dependent class, had hard scramble existences. Eldest sons were all powerful heirs-at-law in Colonial Virginia, could even negate land legacies made by their fathers in wills. The point is that the Lancelot Davenport of 1639 was not the Lancelot of 1625 and before. He had either bought his headright from whoever owned it, possibly Edward Blaney, his master, or whoever had paid for his transportation to Virginia in 1620, or it had been conferred upon him as a reward. Davenport was in Virginia a year (1620) before Blaney (1621), could have preceded his master-but those who were still servants in 1625, were unlikely to have preceded a master in 1620 unless in the interim household of an another master. (Every resident of Virginia at this time was either a master or in the household of a master.) Possibly, Davenport had been recruited by the London Company for service in Virginia, had been transported on a Company ship-which the Duty was in 1620, and was a servant (employee) in the household and entourage of whoever was the Company's factor in Virginia. If so, his 1620 passage generated no headright, for the 50-acre bounty was not put in place until after the Company's charter had been cancelled in 1625 and Virginia had become a Crown Colony. Blaney disappeared from Virginia records after 1627, as had Davenport in 1625. Either Davenport left Virginia with Blaney or he went into another household in servant status, for despite the meager population in Virginia 1625-1639, no evidence of Lancelot's presence has been found for the interim years. If he had arrived in America in indentured servant status, he was surely a freeman by 1625, for four years was the usual period to pay for a passage. He could have been a freeman from the beginning, could have contracted to go to Virginia in a servant's or subordinate capacity, working for agreed wages. If he was a scrivener, a scribe, a bookkeeper, a clerk, or such, as were later Davenports who appeared on James River waters, he could have easily been in Virginia for the years between 1625 and 1639 without appearing in the records, particularly if he was one of those making and keeping those records. Scriveners, scribes, bookkeepers and clerks were faceless, but crucial to the order and upkeep of business and government, hence were closely associated with and in direct support to all sorts of authority as well as to the planter aristocracy. If Lancelot occupied such a role, the service could have earned him the grant for a PERSONAL ADVENTURE headright, and apparently did. The Virginia Company was defunct after 1628 and all residual rights held by the Company were quashed. Headrights were granted by the King through the Royal Governor of Virginia and his Council, subsequently delegated to County Courts, and if those serving the Sovereign decided to award Lancelot Davenport 50 acres of land after almost twenty years in the Colony, and to identify it as his PERSONAL ADVENTURE, they were free to do so. Someone did, for this patent is evidence thereof. The nature of Davenport's land grant and its subsequent history tell us certain things. Few 50-acre grants were made, because it was generally recognized, as attested by the set number of acres assigned to each headright, that a minimum of 50 acres were required to support one person, living off the land, in the Virginia wilderness. A married man needed at least 100 acres, etc. There were few patents, excluding those for parcels of real estate in Jamestown and Elizabeth City, which were for less than 100 acres. The median grant in Virginia before 1650 was in the 300-400 acres range. Lancelot's patent appears to have been the only one of that size in what subsequently became Surry County. No 50-acre patents have been encountered in searching early Charles City County grants in the area of our interest. Thus, there was not only a unique or special treatment involved in Lancelot's being granted a PERSONAL ADVENTURE, the size of his grant was unusual itself. What the patent did, however, was possibly its greatest worth to Lancelot. It made him a freeholder, and a freeholder had social stature, was a man with a vote, a man who could be appointed to public office (the importance of which was directly related to how many acres he owned), who could sit on juries (grand juries if he owned 300 or more acres), and who had the freedom of the realm. He was not required to have a Master, for he was a Master with his own domain, mean and small though it might be. His public power and stature as a freeholder was directly related to how many acres he owned, a circumstance that left Lancelot at the bottom of that ladder, meaning that when among other freeholders he was silent until invited to speak, deferential to his betters, and respectful to the aristocracy. Land Grants were not made without stipulations. The grantee was expected to seat and seed (build a house and plant) or make improvements-clear and plant a certain number of acres, put up sheds and fences, etc, within a given time. Failure to do so resulted in the grant being declared deserted, forfeited back to the Crown, and being re-granted to another patentee. When a tract was re-granted, the new patent customarily included a description of the provenance of the title, cited the original patentee, his or her loss of the right and cause, its reversion to the King, and the reissue circumstances. The second patentee had to pay the same in headrights as had the original patentee. In other words, the King repetitiously collected the full price of deserted land every time that it was re-conveyed by patent. Strangely, once Lancelot's patent was granted and recorded, it received no further mention in Land Office Records. It was not deserted by failure to seat and seed and then re-granted. It was not escheated, i.e., land returned to the King from the estate of an intestate who had no heirs. Further, although the survey description to Lancelot's patent indicates that it was open (vacant land adjoined) on at least three sides, viz., it bounded Thomas Gray on the West, no subsequent patents were noted as adjoining Lancelot Davenport although three sides of his grant was vacant land. Davenport's patent was swallowed up somehow by an adjoining patent, or went unmentioned in the survey. Both passing strange, for English land law and practices in the Seventeenth Century had been firmly codified for more than five hundred years when Virginia was colonized, and by those laws and practices there should have been some record as to what happened to Lancelot's 50-acre freehold. The acreage was small, insignificant by Virginia standards, but it was a freehold, and English Land Law protected land titles equally, regardless of size. 5 |
Family | ||
| Child | ||
| Last Edited | 24 Oct 2003 |
Citations
- [S236] James River Davenports, online http://homepages.rootsweb.com/~nvjack/davnport/…, p. 2.
- [S236] James River Davenports, online http://homepages.rootsweb.com/~nvjack/davnport/…, p. 9.
- [S236] James River Davenports, online http://homepages.rootsweb.com/~nvjack/davnport/…, p. 11.
- [S236] James River Davenports, online http://homepages.rootsweb.com/~nvjack/davnport/…, p. 8.
- [S236] James River Davenports, online http://homepages.rootsweb.com/~nvjack/davnport/…, p. 27.
- [S236] James River Davenports, online http://homepages.rootsweb.com/~nvjack/davnport/…, p. 47.
Oliver Davenport1
M, #12254
| Father* | Lancelot Davenport1 b. 1596 | |
Oliver Davenport||p409.htm#i12254|Lancelot Davenport|b. 1596|p409.htm#i12253|||||||||||||||| | ||
| Charts | Winifred Dean Pedigree |
| Event-Misc* | 3 November 1673 | Charles City, VA, LAND PATENT: Richard Taylor, 1,000 acres in Charles City County, on the south side of James River on the Blackwater, behind Merchants Hope, at a place called Saw Tree. Begin-ning at a swamp nigh the house given said Richard by will of Richard Taylor [Sr.], his father. [No consideration was noted as given for the land, but 20 headrights worth 50 acres each would have been the customary consideration. The following 18 names were listed at the end of the patent without identification.] Tho. Mayson, Pollidor Richard, Richd. Putnam, Jo. Davis, Jno. Adams, Eliz. Seabrook, Hen. Roberts, Tho. Hudson, Oliver Davenport, Eliz. Wise, Ellen Faircloth, Aylse [Alice?] Asley, Anne Towsing, Richd. Stafford, Tho. Jones, Eliz. Herd, Wm. Hewgille, Susan Fairbrother. (Virginia Patents, 6:488) No claim is made that Oliver Davenport was the father of or any way closely related to George Davenport, patriarch of the Prince George Davenports, but by research done to the present, Oliver was the first Davenport associated with Charles City/Prince George land, land within the inverted triangular area designated as the land of interest to the Chronicles. The land that he was associated with in 1673 was no more than three miles from where George Davenport, by his marriage to Mary Marks, had land by 1719. George's land was on the waters of Wards Creek, the next east southerly draught of James River from Powells (Merchants Hope) Creek. Whether George Davenport was an immigrant or Virginia born will be dealt with later. No further mentions of Oliver Davenport have been found in Virginia patents. 1 |
Family | ||
| Child |
| |
| Last Edited | 24 Oct 2003 |
Citations
- [S236] James River Davenports, online http://homepages.rootsweb.com/~nvjack/davnport/…, p. 47.
Edward Marks1
M, #12255
| Father* | Matthew Marks1 d. bt 15 Aug 1719 - 13 Oct 1719 | |
Edward Marks||p409.htm#i12255|Matthew Marks|d. bt 15 Aug 1719 - 13 Oct 1719|p391.htm#i11703|||||||||||||||| | ||
| Last Edited | 14 Oct 2003 |
Citations
- [S236] James River Davenports, online http://homepages.rootsweb.com/~nvjack/davnport/…, p. 63.
John Marks1
M, #12256
| Father* | Matthew Marks1 d. bt 15 Aug 1719 - 13 Oct 1719 | |
John Marks||p409.htm#i12256|Matthew Marks|d. bt 15 Aug 1719 - 13 Oct 1719|p391.htm#i11703|||||||||||||||| | ||
| Last Edited | 14 Oct 2003 |
Citations
- [S236] James River Davenports, online http://homepages.rootsweb.com/~nvjack/davnport/…, p. 63.
Israel Marks1
M, #12257
| Father* | Matthew Marks1 d. bt 15 Aug 1719 - 13 Oct 1719 | |
Israel Marks||p409.htm#i12257|Matthew Marks|d. bt 15 Aug 1719 - 13 Oct 1719|p391.htm#i11703|||||||||||||||| | ||
| Last Edited | 14 Oct 2003 |
Citations
- [S236] James River Davenports, online http://homepages.rootsweb.com/~nvjack/davnport/…, p. 63.
Sarah Marks1
F, #12258
| Father* | Matthew Marks1 d. bt 15 Aug 1719 - 13 Oct 1719 | |
Sarah Marks||p409.htm#i12258|Matthew Marks|d. bt 15 Aug 1719 - 13 Oct 1719|p391.htm#i11703|||||||||||||||| | ||
| Marriage* | before 1680 | Prince George, VA, Principal=Nicholas Robinson2 |
| Last Edited | 14 Oct 2003 |
Citations
- [S236] James River Davenports, online http://homepages.rootsweb.com/~nvjack/davnport/…, p. 63.
- [S252] Beverly R. Baughn, 28 Oct 2003.
Elizabeth Marks1
F, #12259
| Father* | Matthew Marks1 d. bt 15 Aug 1719 - 13 Oct 1719 | |
Elizabeth Marks||p409.htm#i12259|Matthew Marks|d. bt 15 Aug 1719 - 13 Oct 1719|p391.htm#i11703|||||||||||||||| | ||
| (Witness) Will | 15 August 1719 | Prince George, VA, Principal=Matthew Marks |
| Last Edited | 14 Oct 2003 |
Citations
- [S236] James River Davenports, online http://homepages.rootsweb.com/~nvjack/davnport/…, p. 65.
Thomas Davenport1
M, #12260
| Father* | George Davenport1 d. b 14 Aug 1739 | |
| Mother* | Mary Marks1 | |
Thomas Davenport||p409.htm#i12260|George Davenport|d. b 14 Aug 1739|p391.htm#i11701|Mary Marks||p391.htm#i11702|Oliver Davenport||p409.htm#i12254||||Matthew Marks|d. bt 15 Aug 1719 - 13 Oct 1719|p391.htm#i11703|||| | ||
| (Witness) Probate | 14 August 1739 | Prince George, VA, George Davenport, late of Martin's Brandon Parish, Prince George County, Decd. Thomas Davenport, eldest son and heir-at-law of the Decedent, appeared in Court and made Oath that his father had died without a will. On motion of said Thomas, he was given Letters of Administration on the Estate of said George Davenport, Decd. Holmes Boisseau, Richard Wortham, William Heath, and John Jones, or any three, appointed to appraise in current money the Slaves, if any, and other personal property of the Decedent, and return a report thereof to Court. (Prince George County, VA, Court Orders, 1733-1739, 311), Principal=George Davenport1 |
| Last Edited | 14 Oct 2003 |
Citations
- [S236] James River Davenports, online http://homepages.rootsweb.com/~nvjack/davnport/…, p. 69.
Anna Maud Pinkerton
F, #12266, b. 9 March 1886, d. 15 October 1962
| Father* | Charles Walter Pinkerton b. 7 Sep 1860, d. 3 Aug 1946 | |
| Mother* | Catherine Maria Barker b. 2 Apr 1869, d. 13 Dec 1957 | |
Anna Maud Pinkerton|b. 9 Mar 1886\nd. 15 Oct 1962|p409.htm#i12266|Charles Walter Pinkerton|b. 7 Sep 1860\nd. 3 Aug 1946|p47.htm#i1408|Catherine Maria Barker|b. 2 Apr 1869\nd. 13 Dec 1957|p47.htm#i1407|James H. Pinkerton|b. 2 Dec 1833\nd. 3 Dec 1911|p419.htm#i12564|Ann E. McKelvey|b. 12 Dec 1830\nd. 28 Mar 1909|p419.htm#i12565|Joseph Barker|b. 29 Sep 1835\nd. 29 Oct 1896|p47.htm#i1400|Mary A. Doidge|b. 30 Apr 1837\nd. 29 Jun 1910|p47.htm#i1401| | ||
| Birth* | 9 March 1886 | Mancos, Montezuma, Colorado, USA |
| Death* | 15 October 1962 | Durango, LaPlata, Colorado, USA |
| Burial* | Durango, LaPlata, Colorado, USA | |
| Note* | 1240,127 1900 census Mancos, Montezuma, Colo Family records of Frank W. Pinkerton, P.O. box 190645, Anchorage, Alaska 99519. Per Frank Pinkerton records: Husband #2=John Lyons |
| Last Edited | 14 Oct 2003 |
Close