I normally don’t read books by Fox News commentators, but I saw Judge Andrew Napolitano interviewed by Ralph Nader on CSPAN Book TV and was interested in his principled advocacy of strict constructionism. So I read his book The Constitution in Exile: How the Federal Government Has Seized Power by Rewriting the Supreme Law . . . → Read More: The Constitution in Exile
I think most Americans don’t understand the full context of the right to bear arms in the Second Amendment. The typical Englishman did not have the right to bear arms. This was reserved for knights, soldiers, and men-at-arms of the great lords or the king. If a peasant was caught with armor, a sword, . . . → Read More: The Right to Bear Arms
Some Republicans are in a lather because of chairman Michael Steele’s observations that the War in Afghanistan is not likely to be winnable and that it is Obama’s War. While he failed to mention that Obama inherited the War, he is correct that it is now Obama’s War, since he has the power to . . . → Read More: Michael Steele is Right!
NPR has been running a series on how new findings in neurophysiology of psychopaths are affecting sentencing of criminals with this trait. In some cases, it has not swayed juries (e.g. Chicago). In others, it has (Tennessee). I think the whole story highlights flaws in our philosophy of culpability and punishment. The crux of . . . → Read More: The psychopath’s brain and the courts
The Supreme Court today invalidated Chicago’s law against citizens having firearms for self protection. I agree with the decision, but wish they had decided it on the basis of the “privileges and immunities” clause of the 14th Amendment and not “due process.”
One of the major purposes of the authors of the 14th Amendment . . . → Read More: McDonald v. Chicago